Mario Diaz-Balart
Activity, page 4 of 8. · Back to their grades and bills
Activity
Newest first, 2,400 rows in all. Recorded votes show the bill's title and the official question verbatim, and link to the official record; an absence shows the stated reason when one exists. Actions on the bills this member introduced are the government's own wording, word for word. How statements and votes are paired.
Showing all 300 on this page.
-
Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Boebert of Colorado Part B Amendment No. 18
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Boebert of Colorado Part B Amendment No. 9
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Boebert of Colorado Part B Amendment No. 8
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Boebert of Colorado Part B Amendment No. 7
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
ACCESS Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Van Drew of New Jersey Part A Amendment No. 64
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Van Drew of New Jersey Part A Amendment No. 63
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Van Drew of New Jersey Part A Amendment No. 62
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Roy of Texas Part A Amendment No. 56
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Roy of Texas Part A Amendment No. 54
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Rosendale of Montana Part A Amendment No. 53
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 51
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 50
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 49
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 48
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 47
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 46
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 45
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 44
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 43
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part A Amendment No. 42
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Ogles of Tennessee Part A Amendment No. 36
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Improving Access to Our Courts Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
-
Victims' VOICES Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8997) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8998) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Voted to adopt those debate terms
What this vote decided: This resolution sets the terms for debating another bill — how long the House debates it and which amendments may be offered. A Yea adopts those terms; a Nay rejects them. how these are written
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8997) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8998) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.
On Ordering the Previous Question
What this vote decided: Ordering the previous question ends debate and amendments and brings the pending matter to an immediate vote. A Yea ends debate; a Nay keeps it open. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Water Resources Development Act of 2024
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Pro Codes Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
A bill to designate the outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs in Wyandotte County, Kansas City, Kansas, as the "Captain Elwin Shopteese VA Clinic".
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121".
Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding
Voted to enact it over the veto
What this vote decided: A vote to enact the bill over the President's veto, which takes two thirds of those voting. A Yea enacts it; a Nay leaves the veto standing. how these are written
-
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance".
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain subpoena.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Voted to adopt it
What this vote decided: The vote on the resolution itself. A resolution states the chamber's position or changes its own rules; it does not become law. A Yea adopts it; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2025
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2025
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Jackson of Texas Amendment No. 4
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Self of Texas Amendment No. 3
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Huizenga of Michigan Amendment No. 1
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain subpoena.
On Motion to Refer
Voted to keep it on the floor
What this vote decided: Hands the measure to a committee rather than voting on it now. A Yea sends it to committee; a Nay keeps it on the floor. how these are written
-
Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain subpoena.
On Motion to Table
Voted to keep it alive
What this vote decided: Tabling disposes of the matter without a vote on its merits — in practice, it kills it. A Yea kills it; a Nay keeps it alive. how these are written
-
SAVE Act
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
SAVE Act
On Motion to Recommit
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
No explanation on record.
- Bill action Jul 10, 2024 · H.Res. 1351 (118th)
Introduced in House
- Bill action Jul 10, 2024 · H.Res. 1351 (118th)
Introduced in House
- Bill action Jul 10, 2024 · H.Res. 1351 (118th)
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Foreign Affairs Committee
-
Stop Unaffordable Dishwasher Standards Act
On Passage
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Stop Unaffordable Dishwasher Standards Act
On Motion to Recommit
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Refrigerator Freedom Act
On Passage
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Refrigerator Freedom Act
On Motion to Recommit
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8281) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 165) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8772) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7700) to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing or enforcing energy conservation standards for dishwashers that are not cost-effective or technologically feasible, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7637) to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing or enforcing energy conservation standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers that are not cost-effective or technologically feasible, and for other purposes.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
What this vote decided: This resolution sets the terms for debating another bill — how long the House debates it and which amendments may be offered. A Yea adopts those terms; a Nay rejects them. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8281) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 165) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8772) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7700) to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing or enforcing energy conservation standards for dishwashers that are not cost-effective or technologically feasible, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7637) to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing or enforcing energy conservation standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers that are not cost-effective or technologically feasible, and for other purposes.
On Ordering the Previous Question
What this vote decided: Ordering the previous question ends debate and amendments and brings the pending matter to an immediate vote. A Yea ends debate; a Nay keeps it open. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Long Island Sound Restoration and Stewardship Reauthorization Act of 2023
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Alabama Underwater Forest National Marine Sanctuary and Protection Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
- Bill action Jul 8, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Received in the Senate.
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Titus of Nevada Part A Amendment No. 171
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Tenney of New York Part A Amendment No. 164
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Tenney of New York Part A Amendment No. 163
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4424-4426)
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Ms. Meng moved to recommit to the Committee on Appropriations. (text: CR H4425)
Appropriations Committee
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 200 - 212 (Roll no. 334).
Appropriations Committee
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 200 (Roll no. 335).
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 200 (Roll no. 335).
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Pursuant to clause 1(c) of Rule XIX, the House resumed consideration on H.R. 8771.
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 8771.
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The House adopted the amendments en gros as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
- Bill action Jun 28, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
-
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Moore of Alabama Part A Amendment No. 129
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Jayapal of Washington Part A Amendment No. 72
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Greene of Georgia Part A Amendment No. 57
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Greene of Georgia Part A Amendment No. 56
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Wilson of South Carolina Part B Amendment No. 75
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Waltz of Florida Part B Amendment No. 72
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Tiffany of Wisconsin Part B Amendment No. 68
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Tenney of New York Part B Amendment No. 64
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Tenney of New York Part B Amendment No. 63
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Steube of Florida Part B Amendment No. 61
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Spartz of Indiana Part B Amendment No. 59
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part B Amendment No. 54
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Ogles of Tennessee Part B Amendment No. 50
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Moskowitz of Florida Part B Amendment No. 45
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Mace of South Carolina Part B Amendment No. 36
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Mace of South Carolina Part B Amendment No. 35
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Hageman of Wyoming Part B Amendment No. 22
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Hageman of Wyoming Part B Amendment No. 21
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Greene of Georgia Part B Amendment No. 20
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Greene of Georgia Part B Amendment No. 19
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Greene of Georgia Part B Amendment No. 18
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Gosar of Arizona Part B Amendment No. 16
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Gosar of Arizona Part B Amendment No. 15
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Gosar of Arizona Part B Amendment No. 14
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Gosar of Arizona Part B Amendment No. 13
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Burchett of Tennessee Part B Amendment No. 9
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Burchett of Tennessee Part B Amendment No. 4
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Brecheen of Oklahoma Part B Amendment No. 3
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Brecheen of Oklahoma Part B Amendment No. 2
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Brecheen of Oklahoma Part B Amendment No. 1
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 8771 as unfinished business.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4326-4354)
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4389-4393)
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 48.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 49.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 50.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 54.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ramirez amendment No. 57.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Spartz amendment No. 59.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Steube amendment No. 61.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Steube amendment No. 62.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Tenney amendment No. 63.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Tenney amendment No. 64.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Waltz amendment No. 72.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Wilson (SC) amendment No. 75.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Tiffany amendment No. 67.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Tiffany amendment No. 68.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Mr. Diaz-Balart moved that the committee rise.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 50, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 54, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Diaz-Balart demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Spartz amendment No. 59, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Meng demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Steube amendment No. 61, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Issa demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Tenney amendment No. 63, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Tenney amendment No. 64, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Tenney demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Tiffany amendment No. 68, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Waltz amendment No. 72, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Wilson (SC) amendment No. 75, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Wilson (SC) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced further proceedings on H.R. 8771 would be postponed.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 8771.
- Bill action Jun 27, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Tiffany of Wisconsin Part C Amendment No. 59
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Tiffany of Wisconsin Part C Amendment No. 58
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Steube of Florida Part C Amendment No. 57
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Roy of Texas Part C Amendment No. 54
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Rosendale of Montana Part C Amendment No. 53
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Ogles of Tennessee Part C Amendment No. 45
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Ogles of Tennessee Part C Amendment No. 45
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Ogles of Tennessee Part C Amendment No. 43
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Grothman of Wisconsin Part C Amendment No. 20
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Greene of Georgia Part C Amendment No. 18
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Clyde of Georgia Part C Amendment No. 11
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Biggs of Arizona Part C Amendment No. 4
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8774) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8771) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8752) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.
On Agreeing to the Resolution, as Amended
Voted to adopt those debate terms
What this vote decided: This resolution sets the terms for debating another bill — how long the House debates it and which amendments may be offered. A Yea adopts those terms; a Nay rejects them. how these are written
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8774) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8771) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8752) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.
On Ordering the Previous Question
Voted to end debate
What this vote decided: Ordering the previous question ends debate and amendments and brings the pending matter to an immediate vote. A Yea ends debate; a Nay keeps it open. how these are written
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 8771 as unfinished business.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1316. (consideration: CR H4262-4319; text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4266-4297)
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Brecheen amendment No. 1.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Brecheen amendment No. 2.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Brecheen amendment No. 3.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Burchett amendment No. 4.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Burchett amendment No. 5.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Burchett amendment No. 6.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Burchett amendment No. 9.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Burlison amendment No. 8.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Gosar amendment No. 13.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Gosar amendment No. 14.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Gosar amendment No. 15.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Gosar amendment No. 16.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Greene (GA) amendment No. 18.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Greene (GA) amendment No. 19.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Greene (GA) amendment No. 20.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 21.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 22.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Issa amendment No. 23.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Issa amendment No. 24.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lawler amendment No. 32.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Mace amendment No. 35.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Mace amendment No. 36.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moskowitz amendment No. 45.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Diaz-Balart amendment en bloc.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 8771.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 1316 and Rule XVIII.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Mr. Diaz-Balart moved that the committee rise.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Brecheen amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Brecheen amendment No. 2, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Brecheen amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Burchett amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Burchett amendment No. 9, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Gosar amendment No. 13, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Gosar amendment No. 14, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Gosar demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Gosar amendment No. 15, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Gosar demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Gosar amendment No. 16, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Greene (GA) amendment No. 18, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Greene (GA) amendment No. 19, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Greene (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Greene (GA) amendment No. 20, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Greene (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 21, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 22, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Mace amendment No. 35, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Mace demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Mace amendment No. 36, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Mace demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Moskowitz amendment No. 45, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Diaz-Balart demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8774, H.R. 8771 and H.R. 8752. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8774, H.R. 8771, and H.R. 8752, all under a structured rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit for each bill.
- Bill action Jun 26, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The Speaker designated the Honorable Randy K. Weber, Sr. to act as Chairman of the Committee.
-
American Cooperation with Our Neighbors Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Expressing support for democracy and human rights in Pakistan.
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
- Bill action Jun 25, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1316 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8774, H.R. 8771 and H.R. 8752. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8774, H.R. 8771, and H.R. 8752, all under a structured rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit for each bill.
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: James of Michigan Part B Amendment No. 228
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part B Amendment No. 56
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
- Bill action Jun 14, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Introduced in House
- Bill action Jun 14, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Introduced in House
- Bill action Jun 14, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 457.
- Bill action Jun 14, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-554, by Mr. Diaz-Balart.
Appropriations Committee
- Bill action Jun 14, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-554, by Mr. Diaz-Balart.
Appropriations Committee
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Norman of South Carolina Part B Amendment No. 53
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Waltz of Florida Part B Amendment No. 50
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Mills of Florida Part B Amendment No. 49
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Boebert of Colorado Part B Amendment No. 48
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Steube of Florida Part B Amendment No. 46
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Williams of Texas Part B Amendment No. 45
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Clyde of Georgia Part B Amendment No. 44
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Higgins of Louisiana Part B Amendment No. 43
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Norman of South Carolina Part B Amendment No. 42
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Norman of South Carolina Part B Amendment No. 42
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Grothman of Wisconsin Part B Amendment No. 41
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Gaetz of Florida Part B Amendment No. 40
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Van Duyne of Texas Part B Amendment No. 55
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Rosendale of Montana Part B Amendment No. 52
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Greene of Georgia Part B Amendment No. 37
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Recommending that the House of Representatives find United States Attorney General Merrick B. Garland in contempt of Congress for refusal to comply with a subpoena duly issued by the Committee on the Judiciary.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Voted to adopt it
What this vote decided: The vote on the resolution itself. A resolution states the chamber's position or changes its own rules; it does not become law. A Yea adopts it; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Biggs of Arizona Part B Amendment No. 36
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Waltz of Florida Part B Amendment No. 35
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Mace of South Carolina Part B Amendment No. 28
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Roy of Texas Part B Amendment No. 24
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Biggs of Arizona Part B Amendment No. 23
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Greene of Georgia Part B Amendment No. 22
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Mast of Florida Part B Amendment No. 8
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Promoting a Resolution to the Tibet-China Dispute Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8070) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2025 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year; relating to the consideration of House Report 118-527 and an accompanying resolution; and for other purposes.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Voted to adopt those debate terms
What this vote decided: This resolution sets the terms for debating another bill — how long the House debates it and which amendments may be offered. A Yea adopts those terms; a Nay rejects them. how these are written
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8070) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2025 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year; relating to the consideration of House Report 118-527 and an accompanying resolution; and for other purposes.
On Ordering the Previous Question
Voted to end debate
What this vote decided: Ordering the previous question ends debate and amendments and brings the pending matter to an immediate vote. A Yea ends debate; a Nay keeps it open. how these are written
-
WIPPES Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
No Hidden FEES Act of 2023
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Steube of Florida Part B Amendment No. 45
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Schweikert of Arizona Part B Amendment No. 44
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Schweikert of Arizona Part B Amendment No. 43
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Self of Texas Part B Amendment No. 42
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Mast of Florida Part B Amendment No. 28
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Greene of Georgia Part B Amendment No. 16
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Crane of Arizona Part B Amendment No. 10
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Bost of Illinois Part B Amendment No. 8
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8580) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8282) to impose sanctions with respect to the International Criminal Court engaged in any effort to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute any protected person of the United States and its allies.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Voted to adopt those debate terms
What this vote decided: This resolution sets the terms for debating another bill — how long the House debates it and which amendments may be offered. A Yea adopts those terms; a Nay rejects them. how these are written
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8580) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8282) to impose sanctions with respect to the International Criminal Court engaged in any effort to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute any protected person of the United States and its allies.
On Ordering the Previous Question
Voted to end debate
What this vote decided: Ordering the previous question ends debate and amendments and brings the pending matter to an immediate vote. A Yea ends debate; a Nay keeps it open. how these are written
-
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 15 South Valdosta Road in Lakeland, Georgia, as the "Nell Patten Roquemore Post Office".
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Calling on elected officials and civil society leaders to join in efforts to educate the public on the contributions of the Jewish American community.
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
To prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia and to repeal the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
To prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia and to repeal the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Davidson of Ohio Part C Amendment No. 3
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Mooney of West Virginia Part C Amendment No. 2
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Ogles of Tennessee Part C Amendment No. 1
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Perry of Pennsylvania Part B Amendment No. 4
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Norman of South Carolina Part B Amendment No. 3
Voted to change the text
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Casar of Texas Part B Amendment No. 1
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4763) to provide for a system of regulation of digital assets by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5403) to amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 192) to prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Voted to adopt those debate terms
What this vote decided: This resolution sets the terms for debating another bill — how long the House debates it and which amendments may be offered. A Yea adopts those terms; a Nay rejects them. how these are written
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4763) to provide for a system of regulation of digital assets by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5403) to amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 192) to prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia.
On Ordering the Previous Question
Voted to end debate
What this vote decided: Ordering the previous question ends debate and amendments and brings the pending matter to an immediate vote. A Yea ends debate; a Nay keeps it open. how these are written
-
Federal Prison Oversight Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
-
Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2023
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
- Bill action May 21, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Committee on Appropriations Senate Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. Hearings held on the subject prior to measure being received from the House. Hearings printed: S. Hrg. 118-603.
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Subcommittee
-
A resolution regarding violence against law enforcement officers.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Voted to adopt it
What this vote decided: The vote on the resolution itself. A resolution states the chamber's position or changes its own rules; it does not become law. A Yea adopts it; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Israel Security Assistance Support Act
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Israel Security Assistance Support Act
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
Police Our Border Act
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Police Our Border Act
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Amendment: Houlahan of Pennsylvania Part B Amendment No. 6
Voted to leave the text as it stood
What this vote decided: A vote to change the text of the measure, not a vote on the measure itself. A Yea makes the change; a Nay leaves the text as it stands. how these are written
-
LEOSA Reform Act of 2024
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
TICKET Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2023
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2023
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Emergency Medical Services for Children Reauthorization Act of 2024
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Maternal and Child Health Stillbirth Prevention Act of 2024
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Youth Poisoning Protection Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2024
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Detain and Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Cops Act
On Passage
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act
On Passage
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Condemning the Biden border crisis and the tremendous burdens law enforcement officers face as a result.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
What this vote decided: The vote on the resolution itself. A resolution states the chamber's position or changes its own rules; it does not become law. A Yea adopts it; a Nay does not. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
DC CRIMES Act of 2024
On Passage
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Concur in the Senate Amendment
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8369) to provide for the expeditious delivery of defense articles and defense services for Israel and other matters; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7530) to limit youth offender status in the District of Columbia to individuals 18 years of age or younger, to direct the Attorney General of the District of Columbia to establish and operate a publicly accessible website containing updated statistics on juvenile crime in the District of Columbia, to amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to prohibit the Council of the District of Columbia from enacting changes to existing criminal liability sentences, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7343) to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the detention of certain aliens who commit assault against law enforcement officers; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8146) to require a report by the Attorney General on the impact the border crisis is having on law enforcement at the Federal, State, local, and Tribal level; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7581) to require the Attorney General to develop reports relating to violent attacks against law enforcement officers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 354) to amend title 18, United States Code, to improve the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act and provisions relating to the carrying of concealed weapons by law enforcement officers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1213) a resolution regarding violence against law enforcement officers; and providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1210) condemning the Biden border crisis and the tremendous burdens law enforcement officers face as a result.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
What this vote decided: This resolution sets the terms for debating another bill — how long the House debates it and which amendments may be offered. A Yea adopts those terms; a Nay rejects them. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8369) to provide for the expeditious delivery of defense articles and defense services for Israel and other matters; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7530) to limit youth offender status in the District of Columbia to individuals 18 years of age or younger, to direct the Attorney General of the District of Columbia to establish and operate a publicly accessible website containing updated statistics on juvenile crime in the District of Columbia, to amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to prohibit the Council of the District of Columbia from enacting changes to existing criminal liability sentences, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7343) to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the detention of certain aliens who commit assault against law enforcement officers; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8146) to require a report by the Attorney General on the impact the border crisis is having on law enforcement at the Federal, State, local, and Tribal level; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7581) to require the Attorney General to develop reports relating to violent attacks against law enforcement officers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 354) to amend title 18, United States Code, to improve the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act and provisions relating to the carrying of concealed weapons by law enforcement officers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1213) a resolution regarding violence against law enforcement officers; and providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1210) condemning the Biden border crisis and the tremendous burdens law enforcement officers face as a result.
On Ordering the Previous Question
What this vote decided: Ordering the previous question ends debate and amendments and brings the pending matter to an immediate vote. A Yea ends debate; a Nay keeps it open. how these are written
No explanation on record.
- Bill action May 15, 2024 · H.R. 8771 (118th)
Committee on Appropriations Senate Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. Hearings held on the subject prior to measure being received from the House. Hearings printed: S. Hrg. 118-603.
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Subcommittee
-
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
Recruit and Retain Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
No explanation on record.
-
National Construction Safety Team Enhancement Act of 2024
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
-
An act to authorize appropriations for the United States Fire Administration and firefighter assistance grant programs, to advance the benefits of nuclear energy, and for other purposes.
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: Suspension of the rules is a fast route for a measure: no amendments, limited debate, and two thirds of those voting must agree. This is the vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it; a Nay blocks it. how these are written
-
Equal Representation Act
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Equal Representation Act
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
Mining Regulatory Clarity Act of 2024
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written
-
Mining Regulatory Clarity Act of 2024
On Motion to Recommit
Voted against sending it back to committee
What this vote decided: A motion to recommit sends the bill back to committee instead of holding the final vote now. A Yea returns it to committee; a Nay keeps it on course for the final vote. how these are written
-
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121".
On Passage
Voted to pass it
What this vote decided: The final vote on the measure itself. A Yea passes it out of this chamber; a Nay does not. how these are written