Skip to content

Senate Roll #125

Nomination

On the Nomination PN726-1 and PN726-3 and PN726-7 and PN726-10 and PN726-13 and PN726-14 and PN730-41 and PN730-48 and PN730-67 and PN730-66 and PN730-22 and PN730-29 and PN730-31 and PN730-27 and PN726-8 and PN730-56 and PN730-25 and PN786-11 and PN730-52 and PN786-8 and PN806-3 and PN730-57 and PN730-58 and PN730-60 and PN730-8 and PN730-21 and PN730-40 and PN730-43 and PN730-50 and PN730-62 and PN806-6 and PN730-12 and PN786-4 and PN730-3 and PN730-28 and PN730-37 and PN730-51 and PN730-54 and PN786-7 and PN730-68 and PN730-9 and PN730-5 and PN806-4 and PN730-44 and PN730-26 and PN730-61 and PN852-7 and PN730-1 and PN806-1

119th Congress · session 2 · May 18, 2026 class rule R-NOM

Official record ↗

Chamber split

Nomination Confirmed — 46 yea to 43 nay (margin 3)

By party

Democrats
Republicans
Independents

Individual positions (100)

Members shown as “Not voting” had no explanation on record, except where a statement is quoted below. The site reports the split and draws no conclusion about why a member voted as they did.